easy. take out a camera and start recording him.

then publish it. he's argued that he has the right to publish recordings of you to a 3rd party

Those must be banned in public because they destroy other people's human rights.

I had my first contact last week:
social.tchncs.de/@a32/11678264…

"Listening to music" was also an excuse during my discussion with a glasshole.

Probably, they have been prepared by influencers to say that if they are being caught in public.

"Glasshole"

Perfect!

I'm probably not even notice because that's just me but

if people believe it's their right to use surveillance tech in public, I also believe it's other people's right to use things that destroy this surveillance tech, like, idk, viruses or fists

smash that glasses.... while he was wearing them in this case of stupidity

And how can they even be sold legally, they are operating against so many European and individual state laws...

#privacymatters #privacyfirst

"his choice" is just like all sorts of things. religion. politics. smoking.

he gets his choice until it forces his choice to over-ride the choices of those around him.

i'm perfectly comfortable telling someone wearing perv glasses to take them off while they're around me, just like i'd ask someone smoking near me to stop.

Ask him if he's completely unaware that Meta was sending all his recordings to be watched by strangers. EVERYTHING he does with them.

If he doesn't care about your privacy, maybe he'll care about his own.

Edit: I also want to know why no one yells at Ray-ban for carrying this tech.

Pull out your phone and start filming him constantly?

If he complains, you tell him it's your freedom to point your phone at anyone you like. 🙃

Why not just take the smartphone and start filming him (or pretending to).

Just assume they are ok with "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you" - they wouldn't have a leg to stand on arguing they don't want to be filmed...

they using the same libertarian argument, they use for gun ownership - it’s my personal freedom.

Here in my country we do not have speed limit on the highways and the argument, despite all evidence, is same “personal freedom”.

“My personal freedom ends where yours begins” attributed to Immanuel Kant, by no means a commy

tbh in most countries if its a public place there is no right to privacy.

I've seen a guy with sight problems using them for his running training. Volunteers relay information to help keep him safe as he navigates parked cars on pavements, potholes etc.

If he's being a perv then there will be laws that can deal with that. Not easy, tbh.

I would try them for my cycling, tbh. I already run "dashcams" for insurance purposes.

I mean, if its a public space where cameras aren't forbidden, they can do whatever they want. At least provided they follow social norms otherwise (personal space, etc).

That doesn't mean that you have to interact with them. And if they keep insisting, then that's intimitation, and you can call the cops.

That is, if you don't want to go for the "old reliable":

this is why I want clothing with some defensive prints on.

QR codes that go to malicious urls, images that confuse/confound the recognition.
IDK what is possible and what works.

I there was something that made the damn things shortout when viewed, I want that.

Luckily down here in the global south, the crap is not yet penetrating my bubble.

@Katika@chaos.socialYou firmly and politely ask them to leave the premises.
Especially at work - the last thing you need is someone recording the office/ screens/ faces/ names of people that:
1. Have not consented to this processing by a third party (GDPR art. 13 and 14 apply),
2. May contain company sensitive information (e.g. financial information, trade secrets, etc.)

In some contexts, this could be treated as a data breach, and result in criminal charges, I think. I can't think of a reason this would be different from taking pictures of confidential data and taking them out on one's phone.

Edit: typos/ grammar.